In Favor of Ban on Flag Burning

Freedom of speech, the "First Ammendment", a staple part of western socities. A person is granted his or her right to respect at all costs. Every citizen is free to express any and every intent in any and every manner.

Sounds great. My experience leads to believe that it is one of the few things that make life blissful. Yet, I'm strongly against flag-burning. My reasons are two-fold.

a. What kind of "speech" requires torching? Today, burning a flag is "speech". How far is it a day when we move to accept and legalize arson as "speech", too? I've seen too many cars and shops smashed and torched in the name of "protest". Every person is allowed a safe passage to thought, speech, etc; not a passage to arson or torching. A stuffed idol might represent a person or the thoughts he or she adheres to. Burning that might get marginal support, but definitely not flags. Flags stand for something too wide and vast.

b. Whose flag is it that we're burning? What have we actually done to earn the flag? Who gives us the right to burn it, then? We are not the martyrs who lay dead in search of a free land and a proud flag! Flags belong to those freedom-fighter. They are the only ones who can burn it if they like. You wanna burn a flag? Go get one of your own!

On Wisdom

[Wrote the following in a GRE sample test.]

"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."

Wisdom is a concept that borders with Intuition. It is the subtle difference between the two that proves the correctness of the statement above.

Wisdom is accumulative and retrospective in nature. It is about borrowing some knowledge from the vast bank of experience accumulated over the ages. It is about looking back at the past to gain insight about what is ahead of us. Intuition is more about the heart than the brain. Knowledge or reasoning are irrelevant when it comes to taking intuitive decisions.

In my opinion, knowing what to look for is associated with intuitive thinking while knowing what to overlook is associated with wisdom.

A simple narrative example should serve well to explain the statements. Every country faces a vast array of options. Choices between conflicting ideas compel us to exclude various options as we go through. Intuition leads citizens to envision a certain kind of future that they wish to realize. A short list of possibilities and measures associated with them can be prepared by dint of such 'look-for' attitudes, i.e., intuitive thinking. However, when it comes to implementing the goals and giving life to dreams, we need to arrive at a certain, exclusive answer. At that point, it is more important to know what to overlook than what to look for.

The final stage of every such decision-making process requires knowledge about possible consequences. It is easy to pick what we prefer or to demand what we like. Such thoughts are visionary, and hardly require any idea about the world as it is, as it was, or as it will be. On the contrary, knowledge of consequences comes only when one knows about the vastness of the world and the depth of the accumulated experience of the generations before us. Thus we realize that intuition is inclusive and wisdom is exclusive. Every option picked is a hundred options dismissed.

Another example might help further. Every leader knows that his/her country needs more resources. It is a gut-feeling to know that we need resources, facilities, amenities, etc. It is what leaders "look for". However, when faced with the onus of choosing between domestc rationing and invading another country, everything boils down to the knowledge of knowing what not to do. Wisdom is reflected not in the possibilities we explore, but in the decisions we arrive at by overlooking all else.

In fine, based on the retrospective nature and exclusiveness of wisdom, I believe it is rightly attributed people who know what to overlook. If life is compared to a sentence, visionaries start the sentence by looking for the correct word and wise people draw the appropriate conclusions on the basis of prior knowledge and intelligent exclusion.